[cmucl-imp] Re: Would ext:exit be a good addition?
Raymond Toy
toy.raymond at gmail.com
Sat Jan 30 03:37:58 CET 2010
On 1/29/10 2:12 PM, Carl Shapiro wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Raymond Toy <toy.raymond at gmail.com
> <mailto:toy.raymond at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> How about overloading recklessly-p to include the exit code? If
> recklessly-p is a negative integer, do a reckless exit with and exit
> code of the absolute value of the code. If it's a positive integer,
> carefully exit with the given code.
>
>
> These kinds of ugly interfaces should be limited to Emacs Lisp. If
> this had to change, and its not clear that it does, maybe adding
> keywords would be somewhat cleaner?
I think the intent was something short and simple. If this is not clean
enough, then perhaps (quite &optional recklessly-p (exit-code 0)) would
be somewhat nicer, and fully backward compatible.
Ray
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.zs64.net/mailman-archive/cmucl-imp/attachments/20100129/0355ad0b/attachment.html>
More information about the cmucl-imp
mailing list