<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
On 1/29/10 2:12 PM, Carl Shapiro wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:4dcb5abd1001291112x795ab7f3vffdbd4da359045db@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Raymond
Toy <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:toy.raymond@gmail.com">toy.raymond@gmail.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">How
about overloading recklessly-p to include the exit code? If<br>
recklessly-p is a negative integer, do a reckless exit with and exit<br>
code of the absolute value of the code. If it's a positive integer,<br>
carefully exit with the given code.<br>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
These kinds of ugly interfaces should be limited to Emacs Lisp. If
this had to change, and its not clear that it does, maybe adding
keywords would be somewhat cleaner?<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<tt>I think the intent was something short and simple. If this is not
clean enough, then perhaps (quite &optional recklessly-p (exit-code
0)) would be somewhat nicer, and fully backward compatible.<br>
<br>
Ray<br>
<br>
</tt>
</body>
</html>