[cmucl-help] Command Line options in standalone executables

[Didier Verna]

Raymond Toy <toy.raymond at gmail.com> wrote:

> Fixed the problem. It was an issue with how the command line is parsed
> when there are no other options besides --.

  OK. Now, even with this problem fixed, it is still not clear to me
whether it is possible to create executables in which all command-line
options are in fact user-level.

The closest I got was to use :process-command-line nil, in which case
what you get in *command-line-strings* is the command line used to
create the executable, but then, I don't see a way to retrieve the one
used to launch the executable. Is it possible to get it somehow ?

-- 
Resistance is futile. You will be jazzimilated.

Scientific site:   http://www.lrde.epita.fr/~didier
Music (Jazz) site: http://www.didierverna.com