[cmucl-help] CMUCL 18c building on tru64 5.1

[Fausto Saporito]

Hello all,

I saw there're some patches for 19c and 19d and I found how to apply them.
The question is: how can I update the lisp.core ? Is it needed ? Or do
I have to load each time those patches ?

thanks,
Fausto


2014-09-03 8:41 GMT+02:00 Fausto Saporito <fausto.saporito at gmail.com>:
> Hello Ray,
>
> no luck with 19d. But maybe it has the double-double support too...
>
> I have the same errors, but instead of sigsegv at the end, I got a
> stack overflow:
>
> Control stack overflow
>    [Condition of type STACK-OVERFLOW]
>
> Restarts:
>   0: [CONTINUE] Blow this file
>   1:            Return NIL from load of "target:tools/worldcom".
>   2: [ABORT   ] Return to Top-Level.
>
> Debug  (type H for help)
>
> (YELLOW-ZONE-HIT)
> Source:
> ; File: target:code/interr.lisp
> (ERROR 'STACK-OVERFLOW)
>
> and in compile-compiler.log I found again a DOUBLE-DOUBLE reference:
>
> ; Comment: $Header:
> /project/cmucl/cvsroot/src/compiler/new-assem.lisp,v 1.34 2004/08/02
> 16:04:42 cwang Exp $
>
> ; Compiling DEFUN SEGMENT-MAP-OUTPUT:
>
> Bound is not *, a DOUBLE-DOUBLE-FLOAT or a list of a DOUBLE-DOUBLE-FLOAT: 0
>
> Aborting...
>
> I'll try with 19c
>
> 2014-09-03 8:29 GMT+02:00 Fausto Saporito <fausto.saporito at gmail.com>:
>> Hello Ray,
>>
>> I started with 19d, but I have this strange error:
>>
>> ; Error: (during macroexpansion)
>> ;
>> ; Error in function META-SC-OR-LOSE:
>> ;    DOUBLE-DOUBLE-REG is not a defined storage class.
>> ; ;
>>
>> ; Error: (during macroexpansion)
>> ;
>> ; Error in function META-SC-OR-LOSE:
>> ;    COMPLEX-DOUBLE-DOUBLE-REG is not a defined storage class.
>>
>> but in 19d there shouldn't be support for DOUBLE-DOUBLE ... correct ?
>>
>> I'm using 19d binaries to cross-build 19d
>>
>> 2014-09-03 4:17 GMT+02:00 Raymond Toy <toy.raymond at gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Fausto Saporito <fausto.saporito at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello Raymond,
>>>>
>>>> thanks for these hints about cross.lisp
>>>> I put in the proper section the unwanted feature.
>>>>
>>>> So, if I force the redefinition of those symbols at the end of
>>>> alpha-cross compiling phase, alpha-target starts but I noticed this
>>>> error among the others:
>>>>
>>>> ; File: /home/fausap/CMUCL/git-ver/cmucl/src/code/lispinit.lisp
>>>>
>>>> ; In: DEFUN SLEEP
>>>>
>>>> ;   (ERROR 'SIMPLE-TYPE-ERROR
>>>> ;          :FORMAT-CONTROL "Invalid argument to SLEEP: ~S.~%~
>>>> ;             Must be a non-negative, non-complex number."
>>>> ;          :FORMAT-ARGUMENTS ...)
>>>> ; Note: Deleting unreachable code.
>>>> ;
>>>>
>>>> DOUBLE-DOUBLE-FLOAT fell through ECASE expression.
>>>> Wanted one of (REAL FLOAT OR SINGLE-FLOAT DOUBLE-FLOAT RATIONAL INTEGER).
>>>>
>>>> it's very strange... I disabled double-double... why I have this error ?
>>>
>>>
>>> I think it's a mismatch between what the cross compiler has and what the
>>> host compiler has. I've never figured this out.
>>>
>>> So, I think it's best to start with a lisp without double-double support.
>>>
>>> Support for double-double was apparently done by 19e, so your best bet is to
>>> do a checkout from 19d.  I think everything that you've done up to now still
>>> applies.
>>>
>>> Once that is done, we can consider adding double-double for alpha. It's
>>> relatively easy, but you'll have to write a bunch of vops. They can probably
>>> be copied almost verbatim from the sparc or ppc ports with small changes in
>>> the actual instructions.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> This is my features list in cross.lisp (I removed extern-alien-name,
>>>> fixup, etc... I don't know what they are doing... so maybe I can put
>>>> back later)
>>>>
>>>> ;;; Cross-compile script to build a alpha core using x86 as the
>>>> ;;; compiling system.  This needs work!
>>>>
>>>> (in-package :cl-user)
>>>>
>>>> ;;; Rename the X86 package and backend so that new-backend does the
>>>> ;;; right thing.
>>>> (rename-package "X86" "OLD-X86" '("OLD-VM"))
>>>> (setf (c:backend-name c:*native-backend*) "OLD-X86")
>>>>
>>>> (c::new-backend "ALPHA"
>>>>    ;; Features to add here
>>>>    '(:alpha
>>>>      :relative-package-names            ; Relative package names from
>>>> Allegro
>>>>      :conservative-float-type
>>>>      :hash-new
>>>>      :random-mt19937                    ; MT-19937 generator
>>>>      :cmu                               ; Announce this is CMUCL
>>>>      :cmu20 :cmu20b                     ; Current version identifier
>>>>      :osf1
>>>>      :bsd
>>>>      :unix
>>>>      )
>>>>    ;; Features to remove from current *features* here
>>>>    '(:sparc-v8 :sparc-v7 :sparc-v9 :sparc
>>>>      ;; Other architectures we aren't using.  Particularly important
>>>>      ;; to get rid of sse2 and x87 so we don't accidentally try to
>>>>      ;; compile the x87/sse2 float support on sparc, which won't work.
>>>>      :x86 :x86-bootstrap :sse2 :x87 :i486
>>>>      :mips :complex-fp-vops
>>>>      ;; Really old stuff that should have been removed long ago.
>>>>      :propagate-fun-type :propagate-float-type :constrain-float-type
>>>>      :double-double
>>>>      :linkage-table
>>>>      :stack-checking                    ; Throw error if we run out of
>>>> stack
>>>>      :heap-overflow-check               ; Throw error if we run out of
>>>>                                         ; heap (This requires gencgc!)
>>>>      :gencgc                            ; Generational GC
>>>>      :modular-arith                     ; Modular arithmetic
>>>>      :executable
>>>>      ;; Other OSes were not using
>>>>      :openbsd :freebsd :glibc2 :linux :mach-o :darwin :sunos :svr4
>>>>      :solaris :sun4
>>>>      :pentium
>>>>      :long-float
>>>>      :new-random
>>>>      :small
>>>>      :mp))
>>>
>>>
>>> One last thing:  remove :alien-callback too. Alpha doesn't support that.
>>>
>>> Hopefully this will get us farther along....
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ray
>>>
>>>